Dr. Michael C. Labossiere, the author of a Macintosh tutorial named Fallacy Tutorial Pro 3.0, has kindly agreed to allow the text of his work to appear here on ramdac.org in electronic form. It remains © Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere, with distribution restrictions. If you have questions or comments about this work, please direct them either to me at ramdac@ramdac.org or to Dr. Labossiere (ontologist@aol.com).


Terms

Introduction   Ad Hominem 
Ad Hominem Tu Quoque 
Appeal to Authority 
Appeal to Belief 
Appeal to Common Practice 
Appeal to Consequences of a Belief 
Appeal to Emotion 
Appeal to Fear 
Appeal to Flattery 
Appeal to Novelty 
Appeal to Pity 
Appeal to Popularity 
Appeal to Ridicule 
Appeal to Spite 
Appeal to Tradition 
Bandwagon 
Begging the Question 
Biased Sample 
Burden of Proof 
Circumstantial Ad Hominem 
Composition 
Confusing Cause and Effect 
Division 
False Dilemma 
Gambler's Fallacy 
Genetic Fallacy 
Guilt By Association 
Hasty Generalization 
Ignoring A Common Cause 
Middle Ground 
Misleading Vividness 
Personal Attack 
Poisoning the Well 
Post Hoc 
Questionable Cause 
Red Herring 
Relativist Fallacy 
Slippery Slope 
Special Pleading 
Spotlight 
Straw Man 
Two Wrongs Make A Right 

Introduction

Description of Fallacies

In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly, an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement (a sentence that is either true or false) that is offered in support of the claim being made, which is the conclusion (which is also a sentence that is either true or false).

There are two main types of arguments: deductive and inductive. A deductive argument is an argument such that the premises provide (or appear to provide) complete support for the conclusion. An inductive argument is an argument such that the premises provide (or appear to provide) some degree of support (but less than complete support) for the conclusion. If the premises actually provide the required degree of support for the conclusion, then the argument is a good one. A good deductive argument is known as a valid argument and is such that if all its premises are true, then its conclusion must be true. If all the argument is valid and actually has all true premises, then it is known as a sound argument. If it is invalid or has one or more false premises, it will be unsound. A good inductive argument is known as a strong (or "cogent") inductive argument. It is such that if the premises are true, the conclusion is likely to be true.

A fallacy is, very generally, an error in reasoning. This differs from a factual error, which is simply being wrong about the facts. To be more specific, a fallacy is an "argument" in which the premises given for the conclusion do not provide the needed degree of support. A deductive fallacy is a deductive argument that is invalid (it is such that it could have all true premises and still have a false conclusion). An inductive fallacy is less formal than a deductive fallacy. They are simply "arguments" which appear to be inductive arguments, but the premises do not provided enough support for the conclusion. In such cases, even if the premises were true, the conclusion would not be more likely to be true.

Examples of Fallacies

  1. Inductive Argument

    Premise 1: Most American cats are domestic house cats.
    Premise 2: Bill is an American cat.
    Conclusion: Bill is domestic house cat.

  2. Factual Error

    Columbus is the capital of the United States.

  3. Deductive Fallacy

    Premise 1: If Portland is the capital of Maine, then it is in Maine.
    Premise 2: Portland is in Maine.
    Conclusion: Portland is the capital of Maine.
    (Portland is in Maine, but Augusta is the capital. Portland is the largest city in Maine, though.)

  4. Inductive Fallacy

    Premise 1: Having just arrived in Ohio, I saw a white squirrel.
    Conclusion: All Ohio Squirrels are white.
    (While there are many, many squirrels in Ohio, the white ones are very rare).

© Copyright 1995 Michael C. Labossiere, with distribution restrictions.